What the Ban on Campaign Finance Is about
You will learn that from the recent cases, courts actually maintained a ban on businesses contributing unlimited funds to campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is why so many people have been eagerly waiting for this ruling on whether corporates will be allowed to contribute in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. The Supreme Court just chose to go by what the previous ruling on the campaign finance laws was without considering its challenges. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. Such would time and again come about if the money is not directly linked to a given individual. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.